Untitled Document
   
Reminder Publications
 
 
| $31 Million for A Rose Kennedy Garden? | Adopt the CPA | An open letter of gratitude | An opportunity not to be missed | A poem for Memorial Day | Appreciation of sidewalk safety | Assistance for soldiers | Benefit | Benefit for child | Boston: The Sequel | Bring troops home | Buy from local farmers | Campaign editorial can tell you a great deal | Child Appreciation Day | Clarification | Clerk of Courts Candidates | Comments on column | Concerns on zoning | Costly Errors in the $30,000 Feasibility Study | Dearth of data | Declining standards | Dedicated troopers | Demolishing Historic Homes | Disappointed in portrayal of Autism | Don't have more candidates to choose from | Flouridation of Longmeadow water | Flouride Fears | Focus on Flouride | From July 27 | Global Warming | Informal Accomplishments | Interested in saving Laughing Brook | Jan. 11, 2006 - Hopes they'll accept invitation | Keeping Costa | Keep these candidates in mind | Kudos to the School Committee | Land threatened | Legacy is important | Letter from Chicopee Herald 6/22 | Letters from July 20th edition | Letters from The Reminder July 4, 2005 | Let us decide | Libertarians and fireworks | Libraries are essential | License to drive | Litter one of many problems | Longmeadow votes for fluoride | Looking for accountability | Lower the age requirement | Minnechaug school rating is an embarrassment | More Draconian steps taken | MRHS is the perfect spot | Need EL Residents' Support | Letters from 6/13 Reminder | No more flouride | Norcross Heroes | Not a pleasant visit to Springfield | Older residents are being ignored | Opposes question one | Please join us to help maintain the Norcross House | Ponder somebody else besides Kerry Healey | Praise for Plaza | Proceed with Caution | Proper Assessing? | Protect the quality of life | Questions high school plan | Questions Regarding Recount | Rebuilding together, after fire | Reflections of an intern | Salmon are endangered | School Matters | School stands up to vandalism | Seeks information on Anna (Burns) Sullivan | Service should be based on committment not salary | Support for teachers | Thanks | Thanks for the support | Thanks to library staff | Thank you | Thank You | Thank you | Thankyou | Thank you | Thank you | Thank You '99' | There needs to be a crossing guard | The use of Chapter 90 funds | They had anti-union/labor agenda from the start | Thoughts on illegal immigration | Thoughts on Laughing Brook | Time for change | To all dog lovers and walkers | To all of our family, friends and neighbors | To the voters of East Longmeadow | Town meetings leave attendees questioning their intelligence and sense of humor | Town needs leader | Town smoking statistics | Transparency isn't just for show | TRIAD | Unhappy about town's new hire | Use of language | Very pleased with Driscoll's amendment | Vote for a change in leadership | Vote for Villamaino | Vote YES for Preservation Act | Vote yes for the future of EL | Vote "yes" on articles 16 and 19 | We are disarming industrially | We can all play a part | Who cares? | Who is to blame for illegal immigrants remaining in the U.S.? | Why are all properties assessed at same rate? | Why I'm voting yes on 23 | Why the rush to judgment? | Wood smoke is harmful |
 
   > Proceed with Caution

Proceed with Caution

On May 22, John J. Fitzgerald, candidate for Longmeadow Selectman wrote an opinion letter that appeared in The Reminder. It seeks to place residential property owners against commercial property owners in the matter of tax rates in Longmeadow.

According to Mr. Fitzgerald, "commercial and industrial properties generate income...and therefore demonstrate that a commercial or industrial property has a great ability to pay than residential property does."

Since when did "ability to pay" determine how much in taxes one pays? The same could hold true for residential property with different people having varying degrees of "ability to pay" determining their individual tax rate.

He states "fairness requires that we look at the justice behind taxing homes and commercial enterprises at the same rate. If we could shift some of the burden from homes to business, people living on a fixed income would not be burdened with carrying their own load and the load of their more affluent commercial neighbors.

This new allocation of taxes will not increase our total revenue and will give minimal relief to the individual homeowner. How much saving is there per individual household? He conveniently omits any figure.

If we raise commercial tax rates two things could happen. Faced with additional costs, businesses will raise their selling prices to recover these costs. If the marketplace does not let them do that, and they cannot easily absorb these costs, they may choose to move to a more tax-friendly town. Many towns give tax incentives to encourage business to move there, thereby creating jobs.

When a business rather than a residence occupies land, there will be no added pressure on our school system. For instance, the potential sale of Twin Hills Golf Club to a residential developer could create as many as 150 new homes with a potential school population increase of about 300 just what our already-overburdened schools need. Let's not discourage commercial usage by raising taxes. And for what personal gain to the average homeowner? Let's see some numbers.

It is interesting to see that Mr. Fitzgerald's first public stance since he declared his candidacy for Longmeadow Selectman will undoubtedly cause some polarization between residents and those merchants and professional people who utilize our commercial space to serve our community. We should proceed with caution.

Sam Altman

Longmeadow

 

 

 
 
Reminder Publications, Inc. 280 North Main St., East Longmeadow, MA 01028 • 413-525-6661
National Newspaper Network, a Division of Reminder Publications
©2006 Reminder Publications, Inc.