Untitled Document
   
Reminder Publications
 
 
| $31 Million for A Rose Kennedy Garden? | Adopt the CPA | An open letter of gratitude | An opportunity not to be missed | A poem for Memorial Day | Appreciation of sidewalk safety | Assistance for soldiers | Benefit | Benefit for child | Boston: The Sequel | Bring troops home | Buy from local farmers | Campaign editorial can tell you a great deal | Child Appreciation Day | Clarification | Clerk of Courts Candidates | Comments on column | Concerns on zoning | Costly Errors in the $30,000 Feasibility Study | Dearth of data | Declining standards | Dedicated troopers | Demolishing Historic Homes | Disappointed in portrayal of Autism | Don't have more candidates to choose from | Flouridation of Longmeadow water | Flouride Fears | Focus on Flouride | From July 27 | Global Warming | Informal Accomplishments | Interested in saving Laughing Brook | Jan. 11, 2006 - Hopes they'll accept invitation | Keeping Costa | Keep these candidates in mind | Kudos to the School Committee | Land threatened | Legacy is important | Letter from Chicopee Herald 6/22 | Letters from July 20th edition | Letters from The Reminder July 4, 2005 | Let us decide | Libertarians and fireworks | Libraries are essential | License to drive | Litter one of many problems | Longmeadow votes for fluoride | Looking for accountability | Lower the age requirement | Minnechaug school rating is an embarrassment | More Draconian steps taken | MRHS is the perfect spot | Need EL Residents' Support | Letters from 6/13 Reminder | No more flouride | Norcross Heroes | Not a pleasant visit to Springfield | Older residents are being ignored | Opposes question one | Please join us to help maintain the Norcross House | Ponder somebody else besides Kerry Healey | Praise for Plaza | Proceed with Caution | Proper Assessing? | Protect the quality of life | Questions high school plan | Questions Regarding Recount | Rebuilding together, after fire | Reflections of an intern | Salmon are endangered | School Matters | School stands up to vandalism | Seeks information on Anna (Burns) Sullivan | Service should be based on committment not salary | Support for teachers | Thanks | Thanks for the support | Thanks to library staff | Thank you | Thank You | Thank you | Thankyou | Thank you | Thank you | Thank You '99' | There needs to be a crossing guard | The use of Chapter 90 funds | They had anti-union/labor agenda from the start | Thoughts on illegal immigration | Thoughts on Laughing Brook | Time for change | To all dog lovers and walkers | To all of our family, friends and neighbors | To the voters of East Longmeadow | Town meetings leave attendees questioning their intelligence and sense of humor | Town needs leader | Town smoking statistics | Transparency isn't just for show | TRIAD | Unhappy about town's new hire | Use of language | Very pleased with Driscoll's amendment | Vote for a change in leadership | Vote for Villamaino | Vote YES for Preservation Act | Vote yes for the future of EL | Vote "yes" on articles 16 and 19 | We are disarming industrially | We can all play a part | Who cares? | Who is to blame for illegal immigrants remaining in the U.S.? | Why are all properties assessed at same rate? | Why I'm voting yes on 23 | Why the rush to judgment? | Wood smoke is harmful |
 
   > Longmeadow votes for fluoride

Longmeadow votes for fluoride

The November 30 Longmeadow Town Meeting yielded rather interesting results and conclusions. All meeting articles that involved additional expenditures were approved at the meeting. The non-binding and binding articles that proposed referendums on termination of fluoridation and could save Longmeadow significant funds, were voted down by 115 residents present at the meeting between 10 and 11:30 p.m. Since there are about 11,000 eligible voters in Longmeadow, 115 residents represent about 1% of all eligible voters in Longmeadow.

Because there is evidence that the dental effect of fluoride is topical rather than systemic ( see www.fluoridealert.org ), ingestion of fluoridated water does not contribute much to dental health. The above observations suggest the following conclusions:

Longmeadow acts as if there are more than sufficient funds for the non-essential as well as essential needs of all residents.

The opinions of the remaining 99% of Longmeadow residents do not have to be considered even if they never had an opportunity to vote on the fluoridation issue.

Longmeadow residents who are convinced that fluoridation of water does more harm than good, have to accept the political reality that the Longmeadow Board of Health (LBH) makes the final decision on the fluoridation issue. The LBH is based on the premise that the industrial grade sodium fluoride that is delivered in a paper bag labeled "poison" and is administered systemically has only positive dental effects and no negative medical effects on any body organ.

LBH also assumes that the quality of teeth in Longmeadow is significantly better that the quality of teeth in non-fluoridated Agawam, East Longmeadow, Hampten. and Wilberham and that this hypothetical difference in the quality of teeth can be attributed only to fluoridation and not to diet and dental hygiene. Furthermore, LBH also assumes that the non-fluoridated communities have the same percent incidence of chronic diseases such as Alzheimer's, arthritis, and hypothyroidism.

On the positive side, I am convinced that fluoridation of the Longmeadow water will be terminated one day, just as it was in essentially all countries of Europe and in many communities in the US. When this happens, even the people who are now supporting fluoridation will be asking why did we ever start the fluoridation and why we did not terminate it sooner.

George J. Krol

Longmeadow

 

 

 
 
Reminder Publications, Inc. 280 North Main St., East Longmeadow, MA 01028 • 413-525-6661
National Newspaper Network, a Division of Reminder Publications
©2006 Reminder Publications, Inc.