Untitled Document
   
Reminder Publications
 
 
| $31 Million for A Rose Kennedy Garden? | Adopt the CPA | An open letter of gratitude | An opportunity not to be missed | A poem for Memorial Day | Appreciation of sidewalk safety | Assistance for soldiers | Benefit | Benefit for child | Boston: The Sequel | Bring troops home | Buy from local farmers | Campaign editorial can tell you a great deal | Child Appreciation Day | Clarification | Clerk of Courts Candidates | Comments on column | Concerns on zoning | Costly Errors in the $30,000 Feasibility Study | Dearth of data | Declining standards | Dedicated troopers | Demolishing Historic Homes | Disappointed in portrayal of Autism | Don't have more candidates to choose from | Flouridation of Longmeadow water | Flouride Fears | Focus on Flouride | From July 27 | Global Warming | Informal Accomplishments | Interested in saving Laughing Brook | Jan. 11, 2006 - Hopes they'll accept invitation | Keeping Costa | Keep these candidates in mind | Kudos to the School Committee | Land threatened | Legacy is important | Letter from Chicopee Herald 6/22 | Letters from July 20th edition | Letters from The Reminder July 4, 2005 | Let us decide | Libertarians and fireworks | Libraries are essential | License to drive | Litter one of many problems | Longmeadow votes for fluoride | Looking for accountability | Lower the age requirement | Minnechaug school rating is an embarrassment | More Draconian steps taken | MRHS is the perfect spot | Need EL Residents' Support | Letters from 6/13 Reminder | No more flouride | Norcross Heroes | Not a pleasant visit to Springfield | Older residents are being ignored | Opposes question one | Please join us to help maintain the Norcross House | Ponder somebody else besides Kerry Healey | Praise for Plaza | Proceed with Caution | Proper Assessing? | Protect the quality of life | Questions high school plan | Questions Regarding Recount | Rebuilding together, after fire | Reflections of an intern | Salmon are endangered | School Matters | School stands up to vandalism | Seeks information on Anna (Burns) Sullivan | Service should be based on committment not salary | Support for teachers | Thanks | Thanks for the support | Thanks to library staff | Thank you | Thank You | Thank you | Thankyou | Thank you | Thank you | Thank You '99' | There needs to be a crossing guard | The use of Chapter 90 funds | They had anti-union/labor agenda from the start | Thoughts on illegal immigration | Thoughts on Laughing Brook | Time for change | To all dog lovers and walkers | To all of our family, friends and neighbors | To the voters of East Longmeadow | Town meetings leave attendees questioning their intelligence and sense of humor | Town needs leader | Town smoking statistics | Transparency isn't just for show | TRIAD | Unhappy about town's new hire | Use of language | Very pleased with Driscoll's amendment | Vote for a change in leadership | Vote for Villamaino | Vote YES for Preservation Act | Vote yes for the future of EL | Vote "yes" on articles 16 and 19 | We are disarming industrially | We can all play a part | Who cares? | Who is to blame for illegal immigrants remaining in the U.S.? | Why are all properties assessed at same rate? | Why I'm voting yes on 23 | Why the rush to judgment? | Wood smoke is harmful |
 
   > Concerns on zoning

Concerns on zoning

The following letter was sent to David A. Lavenburg and Phil N. Clark:

This letter concerns the Kane property and the historic home on that site. I was in attendance at the Zoning Board meeting this week, and understand that house will, in all probability, be coming down and "rebuilt."

The Zoning Board must interpret the by-laws of the Town of Longmeadow. As your page on the town's website explains, this also means making exceptions... "To make special exceptions to the terms of by-laws in harmony with its general purpose and intent, and in accordance with general or specific rules.and laws of the Commonwealth." Before the house is destroyed and a Special Permit is approved, it is my hope that your board will consider the following:

The plot plans submitted should be clear and comprehensive. Several measurements were missing and it was a confusing plan. Even the lawyers were not confident that the measurements were complete. The new structure seems to be on a much larger footprint. The first floor alone will be 2,000 square feet and the house to be demolished is only 1,400 square feet total.

The new structure should not be built on the 15 foot setback line for the north side, but set to 16 feet as suggested by a member of your board. The abutters will be crowded otherwise.

Elevations of all four sides should be submitted for your approval. I did not see a single elevation at the meeting and suggest that the owners should obtain clear plans from their architect as soon as possible. For you to approve removal of the old house on a non-conforming lot when you are blind as to what is being built is short-sighted and harmful to the neighbors.

Although there are no by-laws requiring square footage of the new structure, perhaps it is time for the Zoning and Planning Boards to set up rules and guidelines for the future. Homes should be a certain percentage of total lot area, as not to overwhelm the neighborhoods they are built in and fit into the streetscape. It is time to revise the by-laws.

Thank you for your time. I understand that your decision will be made at the next meeting on Dec. 6. Should the Kane Brothers not have clear plans and elevations for all four sides, I would suggest that you delay any decision until 2007.

Betsy Port

Historical Commission Member

Longmeadow



 

 

 
 
Reminder Publications, Inc. 280 North Main St., East Longmeadow, MA 01028 • 413-525-6661
National Newspaper Network, a Division of Reminder Publications
©2006 Reminder Publications, Inc.