Untitled Document
   
Reminder Publications
 
 
| $31 Million for A Rose Kennedy Garden? | Adopt the CPA | An open letter of gratitude | An opportunity not to be missed | A poem for Memorial Day | Appreciation of sidewalk safety | Assistance for soldiers | Benefit | Benefit for child | Boston: The Sequel | Bring troops home | Buy from local farmers | Campaign editorial can tell you a great deal | Child Appreciation Day | Clarification | Clerk of Courts Candidates | Comments on column | Concerns on zoning | Costly Errors in the $30,000 Feasibility Study | Dearth of data | Declining standards | Dedicated troopers | Demolishing Historic Homes | Disappointed in portrayal of Autism | Don't have more candidates to choose from | Flouridation of Longmeadow water | Flouride Fears | Focus on Flouride | From July 27 | Global Warming | Informal Accomplishments | Interested in saving Laughing Brook | Jan. 11, 2006 - Hopes they'll accept invitation | Keeping Costa | Keep these candidates in mind | Kudos to the School Committee | Land threatened | Legacy is important | Letter from Chicopee Herald 6/22 | Letters from July 20th edition | Letters from The Reminder July 4, 2005 | Let us decide | Libertarians and fireworks | Libraries are essential | License to drive | Litter one of many problems | Longmeadow votes for fluoride | Looking for accountability | Lower the age requirement | Minnechaug school rating is an embarrassment | More Draconian steps taken | MRHS is the perfect spot | Need EL Residents' Support | Letters from 6/13 Reminder | No more flouride | Norcross Heroes | Not a pleasant visit to Springfield | Older residents are being ignored | Opposes question one | Please join us to help maintain the Norcross House | Ponder somebody else besides Kerry Healey | Praise for Plaza | Proceed with Caution | Proper Assessing? | Protect the quality of life | Questions high school plan | Questions Regarding Recount | Rebuilding together, after fire | Reflections of an intern | Salmon are endangered | School Matters | School stands up to vandalism | Seeks information on Anna (Burns) Sullivan | Service should be based on committment not salary | Support for teachers | Thanks | Thanks for the support | Thanks to library staff | Thank you | Thank You | Thank you | Thankyou | Thank you | Thank you | Thank You '99' | There needs to be a crossing guard | The use of Chapter 90 funds | They had anti-union/labor agenda from the start | Thoughts on illegal immigration | Thoughts on Laughing Brook | Time for change | To all dog lovers and walkers | To all of our family, friends and neighbors | To the voters of East Longmeadow | Town meetings leave attendees questioning their intelligence and sense of humor | Town needs leader | Town smoking statistics | Transparency isn't just for show | TRIAD | Unhappy about town's new hire | Use of language | Very pleased with Driscoll's amendment | Vote for a change in leadership | Vote for Villamaino | Vote YES for Preservation Act | Vote yes for the future of EL | Vote "yes" on articles 16 and 19 | We are disarming industrially | We can all play a part | Who cares? | Who is to blame for illegal immigrants remaining in the U.S.? | Why are all properties assessed at same rate? | Why I'm voting yes on 23 | Why the rush to judgment? | Wood smoke is harmful |
 
   > Clerk of Courts Candidates

Clerk of Courts Candidates

Two candidates for Clerk of Courts are quite distinct



Electoral politics can be a very frustrating thing. The race for Hampden County Clerk of Courts exemplifies this notion. The job is an important but obscure one. Very few voters could adequately describe the job of the Clerk of Courts. The two candidates for the job are quite distinct. Jim Goodhines is a smart young assistant district attorney whose qualifications for the job are clear. His opponent is a career politician who has amassed a veritable fortune in political capital and name recognition during an 18 year stint in the state legislature.

Were the job an appointed position, Brian Lees' appointment would be very similar to the appointment of Michael Brown to head F.E.M.A. Were the clerk's job an appointed position, no rational appointing authority would hire Lees over Goodhines. However, the job is an elective one and the appointing authority is the voters. Affection for Senator Lees is understandable and fair. He is a very nice man and has been very attentive to his constituency while in the senate, but he has absolutely no experience or training relevant to the job of Clerk of Courts. He is not a lawyer, nor has he ever managed anything remotely as large and complex as the courts. While it is technically true that neither clerks of courts nor Supreme Court Justices of the United States must actually be lawyers, it is irrational for voters or presidents to appoint non-lawyers to either post.

Mr. Lees could have stayed in the senate, or he could run for another political post. The job of a court clerk, however, is one that requires administrative and legal competencies that Jim Goodhines has and Senator Lees does not have. The management of our courts is too important to be a political reward.

Jerold J. Duquette

Longmeadow





 

 

 
 
Reminder Publications, Inc. 280 North Main St., East Longmeadow, MA 01028 • 413-525-6661
National Newspaper Network, a Division of Reminder Publications
©2006 Reminder Publications, Inc.